Skip to content

Conversation

@fzowl
Copy link
Contributor

@fzowl fzowl commented Nov 14, 2025

Updating the VoyageAI documentation in relation to the Unstructured-IO/unstructured#4109

cragwolfe pushed a commit to Unstructured-IO/unstructured that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2025
Supporting VoyageAI's contextual model
Counting tokens and creating efficient batches
Documentation change: Unstructured-IO/docs#790
@Paul-Cornell
Copy link
Collaborator

Paul-Cornell commented Nov 17, 2025

@fzowl @cragwolfe

I'm not able to merge this PR as currently presented. I think you're working with a very old version of the tech docs sources:

  • api-reference/how-to/embedding.mdx no longer exists in the current tech docs.
  • The contents of open-source/core-functionality/embedding.mdx are very different here than what exists in the current tech docs.
  • platform/workflows-automation.mdx no longer exists in the current tech docs.

Please let me know how you'd like to proceed.

@fzowl fzowl force-pushed the update_voyageai_docs branch from ee14951 to f7f95ce Compare November 19, 2025 14:32
@fzowl
Copy link
Contributor Author

fzowl commented Nov 19, 2025

@Paul-Cornell @cragwolfe Ah, sorry, it was my mistake. Can you please check now?!

@Paul-Cornell
Copy link
Collaborator

Paul-Cornell commented Nov 21, 2025

@fzowl @cragwolfe Something still isn't looking right to me here. Specifically:

  • For api-reference/workflow/workflows.mdx and snippets/general-shared-text/chunk-limits-embedding-models.mdx, you list 17 available Voyage AI embedding models. However, if I look at our SaaS product today, I count only 8 available Voyage AI embedding models. Why the difference?
  • For open-source/how-to/embedding.mdx, the tech docs already currently link out to https://docs.voyageai.com/docs/embeddings, where Voyage AI's list of supported models is (supposedly) being maintained. We don't list this kind of information for any of the other embedding model providers listed in our open source tech docs. As such, I'm hesitant about making this exception here--especially as this list will likely become outdated fairly quick, especially in a portion of the tech docs that is not as frequently maintained.

Please let me know how you'd like to proceed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants